Is it correct? If yes, maybe it is better for me if I work in Ecoinvent 3.3 + many bridge processes. GreenDelta GmbH 1,229 followers on LinkedIn. Could it depend on a problem of compatibility between ecoinvent 3.2 and openLCA 1.6.3, I am using?įrom the DB download section on Nexus I've read that ecoinvent 3.2 is suitable for OpenLCA 1.4/1.5, but I tried to work with OpenLCA 1.6.3 and it seemed to work well, until I have discover that no system process is present in the ecoinvent DB. Gate-to-gate modules may also later be linked in their appropriate. However, I started to re-build all my model on ecoinvent 3.2, when I've realized that Ecoinvent doesn't show any system process. Life cycle assessment or LCA is a methodology for assessing environmental impacts associated. being more flexible, attached with many databases, can easily connect. My model is quite big, so it is difficult for me to build many bridge processes. of impact assessment result using Simapro and OpenLCA with same material input. To all: Would it be interesting that we provide a script to align the IDs of Agribalyse and ecoinvent? If you are only linking to some few ecoinvent processes, you can manually create connections by creating "bridge processes" that have an ecoinvent product as input and an Agribalyse product as output, but this can become of course a bit tedious depending on the number of processes. Yes that is correct, we use the original IDs from ecoinvent for our releases, and these do not match the ones in Agribalyse, for ecoinvent 3.3.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |